Ruger Blackhawk 41 Mag Review Plus A NMBH
Still have both, plus a NMBH FT and a NM Bisley. Used both for handgun silhouette, but preferred the Ruger. I acquired my first two 41 mags in the mid '70's.
44 is component availability. 44 and the advantage of the. It has no special advantage over a. If yours has a decent price and shows no signs of abuse buy it. In the 5-ish length it is just tollerable. Enough so that I will not own one in the 7+ barrel lengths.
It is important to look at the crane when buying these (or any other revolver). 44 Magnum , I was somewhat critical of it as a choice for self-defense in the woods due to the weight and the power level of some upper-end. In my last article on a Ruger revolver, the Redhawk in. Their DA triggers are often quite good.Ruger Super Blackhawk Hunter: by Jeff Quinn photography by Jeff Quinn & Boge Quinn As I write this, I have just returned from an extended shooting session with Rugers newest single-action revolver the Super Blackhawk Hunter.Actually, the Hunter is a return of a fine sixgun produced by Ruger In this review we will be taking a look at one of the premier luxury hunting handguns available today: the Ruger New Model Super Blackhawk Hunter. The Ruger is more than enough gun and will shoot very well if in good condition.
I truely love that revolver and it is now my chosen revolver for big game (deer, elk, bear, pigs) hunting with a handgun here in the lower 48.I have run the gammit of bullet weights through the. My current revolver is a Bisley Ruger BH with 7 1/2" barrel. I have been shooting it since '75 in numerous revolvers. I just got a 260 grain LSWC but I haven't been able to shoot it yet.I'm going to offer another opinion concerning the. This may not be a true Keith but it is one accurate bullet. With products made in America, Ruger offers consumers almost 800 variations of more than 40 product lines.Mould number one I would recommend is 410459 220 grains, which can be found used.
I've yet to see where a 210 gr SWC or a 250 gr SWC in either the. I also don't have any use for the heavier bullets (300+ gr) in the. That makes it more maneageble to a lot more people.My opinion is there is no real need for the heavier bullets in the. With such it does shoot with less recoil. 41 Magnum excells with the 170 to 210 gr bullets that it was designed for. 44 Magnum as it suffices much better with those bullets than does the.
41 Magnum as they work just as well thank you.I've shot numerous critters big and small with those. I respect others opinions but am just offering mine.I'll stick with the regular range of bullet weights for the. I do not do Texas heart shots so I'll leave the discussion of that and other back to front severe raking shots to those who do. I hear of the "armor plate" that pigs have but I've not killed one yet that a good SWC of normal weight or a good J bullet such as the XTP did not penetrate quite nicely.
I find single action revolver grips very comfortable with the heaviest of. The Ruger RedHawk and the Colt Anaconda's fit my smaller hand and are much more maneageble and comfortable to shoot either single or double action. 357 in an N frame S&W to be painfull, especially in double action mode. 41 are used.I will offer also that I have a small hand and shooting most any magnum cartridge more powerful than the. 41 is more pleasant to shoot and for which reason most can shoot it more accurately if regular weight bullets for the. At practical handgun ranges using cast bullets or jacketed bullets I've not found any difference in "killing" between the two cartridges give similar styles of bullets at equivelent velocities.
0 kommentar(er)
